MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1841350305 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n1p16

Learning to teach: When should the socialization begin?

2015· article· en· W1841350305 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katie Hooven, Nancy C. Sharts‐Hopko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDoctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrutinySocializationCurriculumSpecialtyProcess (computing)PedagogyPsychologySubject (documents)Subject matterMedical educationSociologyMedicinePolitical scienceSocial psychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Socialization is a process where one learns about the roles and patterns of a group. Socialization to the role of a nurse educator is a complicated and diverse issue. Higher education is undergoing major changes, which include increased external scrutiny related to teaching and learning. Historically the process of learning to teach adapts or changes related to economics, demands for educators or other societal reasons. Currently the requirement to teach is met by anyone holding a graduate or terminal degree regardless of his or her respective curriculum. This paper supports the notion graduate education in nursing would be most effective if subject matter related to the student’s nursing specialty as well as content on pedagogy and educational philosophies were integrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.020
Scholarly communication0.0140.030
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0100.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.606
GPT teacher head0.650
Teacher spread0.044 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicDoctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsFrench-language works237,207