MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1841529026 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2013-0063

Prestressed near-surface mounted fibre reinforced polymer reinforcement for concrete structures — a review

2013· review· en· W1841529026 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibre-reinforced plasticReinforcementStructural engineeringMaterials sciencePrestressed concreteFlexural strengthUltimate tensile strengthReinforced concreteComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The specialized application of prestressing the near-surface mounted (NSM) fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement for strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) structures combines the benefits of the FRP reinforcement with the advantages associated with external prestressing. By applying a prestress to the NSM FRP the material is used more efficiently since a greater portion of its tensile capacity is employed. This paper presents a comprehensive review on the performance of RC members strengthened using prestressed NSM FRP reinforcement. Several techniques and anchorage systems developed to prestress the NSM FRP are presented. The static flexural and fatigue performance of RC beams strengthened using prestressed NSM FRP in comparison to non-prestressed NSM is presented. Research on the long-term performance under freeze–thaw exposures and sustained loading is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it