MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1841844684 · doi:10.1139/p11-141

Intrinsic symmetry of Ampère’s circuital law and other educational issues

2012· article· en· W1841844684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joaquim Anacleto, José M. M. M. de Almeida, J.M. Ferreira

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsInterchangeabilitySymmetry (geometry)Perspective (graphical)Current (fluid)Rotational symmetryTheoretical physicsLoop (graph theory)Work (physics)Displacement (psychology)LawMechanicsQuantum mechanicsComputer sciencePsychologyGeometryArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores Ampère’s circuital law (ACL) from an educational perspective. The interchangeability of the ampèrian loop with the current loop, an intrinsic symmetry of ACL that is seldom addressed in the literature or textbooks, is illustrated here. It is verified that the symmetry axis of a circular current is an ampèrian loop. The attempt to apply ACL to a finite wire, a common source of student misunderstanding, is used to highlight the limitations of ACL. The generalisation of ACL is illustrated using an instructive example where the displacement current is unconfined and not spatially uniform. This work is primarily intended for teachers and more advanced undergraduate students, who may benefit from the ideas that are presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.011
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207