MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1842033425 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3098

Integrating Sustainable Development into the Engineering Curriculum

2010· article· en· W1842033425 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Karim El Guemhioui, Nadia Baaziz

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBachelorCurriculumContext (archaeology)Sustainable developmentBridge (graph theory)Engineering ethicsDegree programSustainable energyEngineering managementEngineeringSociologyPedagogyPolitical scienceGeographyMedical educationElectrical engineeringRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The Universite du Quebec en Outaouais (UQO), a small-sized university in the Ottawa-Gatineau area, is about to offer a new electrical engineering Bachelor degree that incorporates into the curriculum courses on earth-friendly technologies and energy efficiency, in a context of sustainable development. We expect UQO to be the first university in the province of Quebec to offer such a program. In this short paper, we present and discuss the key features of this new bachelor degree, relate the main problems that we had to overcome when shaping the program, and briefly reflect on the challenging issue of motivating students to bridge the gap between theory and practice by actually practicing sustainable engineering in their professional life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicEngineering Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207