MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1842033425 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3098

Integrating Sustainable Development into the Engineering Curriculum

2010· article· en· W1842033425 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Karim El Guemhioui, Nadia Baaziz

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBachelorCurriculumContext (archaeology)Sustainable developmentBridge (graph theory)Engineering ethicsDegree programSustainable energyEngineering managementEngineeringSociologyPedagogyPolitical scienceGeographyMedical educationElectrical engineeringRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The Universite du Quebec en Outaouais (UQO), a small-sized university in the Ottawa-Gatineau area, is about to offer a new electrical engineering Bachelor degree that incorporates into the curriculum courses on earth-friendly technologies and energy efficiency, in a context of sustainable development. We expect UQO to be the first university in the province of Quebec to offer such a program. In this short paper, we present and discuss the key features of this new bachelor degree, relate the main problems that we had to overcome when shaping the program, and briefly reflect on the challenging issue of motivating students to bridge the gap between theory and practice by actually practicing sustainable engineering in their professional life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicEngineering Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207