Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this note, we consider the special values of [Formula: see text]-analogues of Dirichlet [Formula: see text]-functions, namely, the values of the functions [Formula: see text] at positive integers [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a primitive Dirichlet character and [Formula: see text] is a complex number such that [Formula: see text]. We prove that if [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is algebraic, then [Formula: see text] is transcendental. We also prove that if [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is algebraic, then there exists a transcendental number [Formula: see text] which depends only on [Formula: see text] and is [Formula: see text]-linearly independent with [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] is algebraic. These results can be viewed as an analogue of the classical result of Hecke on the arithmetic nature of the special values [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".