MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Automatic Animation Generation of a Teleoperated Robot Arm

2008· book-chapter· en· W184259923 on OpenAlexaff
Khaled Belghith, Benjamin Auder, Froduald Kabanza, Philipe Bellefeuille

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space AgencyUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleoperationAnimationComputer scienceRobotic armComputer graphics (images)RobotComputer visionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we describe the Automatic Task Demonstration Generator (ATDG), a system implemented into a software prototype for teaching the operation of a robot manipulator deployed on the International Space Station (ISS). The ATDG combines the use of path planning and camera planning to take into account the complexity of the manipulator, the limited direct view of the ISS exterior, and the unpredictability of lighting conditions in the workspace. The path-planning algorithm not only avoids obstacles in the workspace as is normal for a path-planner, but in addition takes into account the position of corridors for safe operations and the placement of cameras on the ISS. The camera planner is then invoked to find the right arrangement of cameras to follow the manipulator on its trajectory. This allows the on-the-fly production of useful and pedagogical task demonstrations to help the student carry out tasks involving the manipulation of the robot on the ISS. Even if the system has been developed for robotic manipulations, it could be used for any application involving the filming of unpredictable complex scenes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applicationsSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207