MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preliminary evalution of artificial snow cover as a method for the protection of the vine during winter in Québec

2000· article· en· W1842729808 on OpenAlex
Y Jolivet, Jean‐Marie Dubois

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOENO One · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVineSnow coverVineyardSnowEnvironmental scienceShieldWinter wheatPhysical geographyHorticultureMeteorologyGeographyAgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p style="text-align: justify;">The sensitivity of the vine to cold temperatures makes it a high risk crop in Québec. Winter colds during January and February can reach through the course of several days - 30° C and consequently the intense cold can damage the buds. However, during this same period, the snow cover normally present on the ground insures a certain protection to the aerial portions of the vine by insulating them from the intense cold air dominating the surface. Moreover, given the random character of the snowfall regime, vine growers must in addition ridge the vine stocks to protect them from the cold. This research work discusses artificial snow making as a method of protection for the vine and addresses one of the major problems faced by this type of culture under extreme climatic conditions.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Temperature measurements were recorded over four experimental plots during the cold season in a vineyard in Québec. A plot covered by artificial snow for protection against the winter cold was compared with three others, one with a natural snow cover, one with a leaf cover and covered by natural snow and one covered by natural snow with fine ice crusts following snowfalls. Results show that during the major colds of January and February, the vine shoots located at 30 cm from the ground and protected by artificial snow conserved much higher negative minimum temperatures, by as much as 23°C compared to the vine shoots located at the same height on the other plots. Results also reveal that a snow cover of 15 to 20 cm is sufficient to insulate entirely the vine shoots from the ambient air. Hence, the use of artificial snow cover is an efficient method of protection against the cold. However, when using artificial snow covering in the fall while the natural snow cover is still absent, non crystallized water penetrates the ground down to the root zone through percolation and reduces the temperature by approximately 3°C down to a depth of 30 cm. In the same manner, in relation to traditional methods of protection, during spring the early thawing of the snow cover at the center of the ridges leaves the vine shoots without protection and exposes them to late frosts.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Other results relating to the use of artificial snow for covering stocks with regards to bud mortality rate and fruit yield in the fall should permit the evaluation of the real impact of this method on stock productivity and the quality of production.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it