MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1842899261 · doi:10.14288/1.0090793

Aspen, elk, and fire in the Canadian Rocky Mountains

2009· article· en· W1842899261 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) is failing to survive through the sapling stage (2 to 4 m) to tree size in many national parks in western North America. Hypotheses for aspen decline include reduced burning, climate change, high herbivory by native ungulates (mainly elk (Cervus elaphus)), or interactions between these factors. Historic and current aspen condition was investigated in several watersheds, inside and outside of national parks, in the Rocky Mountains of Alberta, Canada to determine the causes of aspen decline. Methods included repeats of historical photographs, fire history by dendrochronology, time-series analysis (of climate, burned area, elk density, and aspen regeneration), wildlife exclosure measurements, analysis of elk functional herbivory response to aspen density, and effects of predation risk on elk-aspen foraging patterns. Aspen regeneration was abundant in historic photographs, is currently abundant in areas with low elk density (<2 elk/ km ), but has declined precipitously in national park areas with high elk density. Historic anthropogenic burning appeared to be important along valley-bottom corridors occupied by aspen, but declined c. 1900 due to changes in cultural land uses. Yearly fluctuations in climatic conditions or burned area did not appear to be factors in aspen decline. Aspen is regenerating in wildlife exclosures on a range of site moisture conditions. Thus, climate or disturbance, either individually, or interactively with herbivory, do not appear to be major factors in aspen decline. However, elk herbivory was a highly significant factor. Elk-aspen herbivory followed a Type 2 functional response (decreased rates of browsing at higher densities of aspen regeneration) that may have occurred because predation sensitive elk avoided dense aspen stands. Historically, valley-bottom aspen habitats were heavily used by predators (humans and wolves) which reduced elk herbivory, and were frequently human-burned which stimulated regeneration of dense stems. Current land uses in national parks (with control of hunting and fire, and high human use that displaces wary predators but habituates elk) are the opposite of these long-term processes. Successful aspen regeneration will likely require a period of very low densities of elk that are wary of predators and humans, followed by restoration of anthropogenic burning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it