The Death and the Life of Beijing —the History, Present Situation and Strategy of Urban Planning in Beijing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the article focus to analysis the problems in the urban planning in Beijing via the planning history, including the protection of places interests, the traffic problems in the centre city and satellite town. Combine some cases of other countries to propose method to solve the present problem. Key words: Beijing; Urban planning; Historical and cultural relic; Traffic problems; Satellite town; Organic evacuation Resume: L'article tente d'analyser les problemes de la planification urbaine de la ville Pekin, y compris la protection des vestiges culturel dans les vieux quartiers, le transport aggravant au centre-ville, la deconnection entre les zones satellite et ville et des problemes de circulation qui en decoulent, a travers l'histoire de l'urbanisation de la ville de Pekin. L'auteur a propose des solutions en etudiant les cas de l'urbanisation dans d'autres pays. Mots-cles: Pekin; Planification urbaine; Centre-ville; Vestiges historiques et culturels; Pression de transport; Satellite; Evacuation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".