MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1843751706 · doi:10.22456/2238-8915.29971

DISCURSO DE VIAGEM E SENSO DE ALTERIDADE

2003· article· fr· W1843751706 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganon · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un des archétypes parmi les plus productifs de la littérature,le voyage est consubstantiel à l’histoire, à la mythologie et à l’ethnographie.Le voyage compris comme éloignement sinueux, fonde un rapportfonctionnel entre distance et émotion et conditionne les formes symboliquesqui s’interposent entre le voyageur-narrateur, l’espace et le temps. Cesrapports et ces formes sont portés par un discours qui insère sa subjectivitédans l’objectivité du réel, de l’histoire, du géographique, du social et dupolitique. Les textes d’une diachronie littéraire qui s’inscrit dans une longuedurée depuis Conrad jusqu’à Abish, donnent à voir comment la positiondes narrateurs de même que leurs opérations discursives et textuellesdéterminent le sens de l’altérité en l’inscrivant dans un jeu relationnel.Nous essayons de démontrer comment le voyage dans la littératuremoderne est avant tout un opérateur cognitif, générateur de savoirs diverset de méta-discours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it