Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un des archétypes parmi les plus productifs de la littérature,le voyage est consubstantiel à l’histoire, à la mythologie et à l’ethnographie.Le voyage compris comme éloignement sinueux, fonde un rapportfonctionnel entre distance et émotion et conditionne les formes symboliquesqui s’interposent entre le voyageur-narrateur, l’espace et le temps. Cesrapports et ces formes sont portés par un discours qui insère sa subjectivitédans l’objectivité du réel, de l’histoire, du géographique, du social et dupolitique. Les textes d’une diachronie littéraire qui s’inscrit dans une longuedurée depuis Conrad jusqu’à Abish, donnent à voir comment la positiondes narrateurs de même que leurs opérations discursives et textuellesdéterminent le sens de l’altérité en l’inscrivant dans un jeu relationnel.Nous essayons de démontrer comment le voyage dans la littératuremoderne est avant tout un opérateur cognitif, générateur de savoirs diverset de méta-discours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".