MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1843771276 · doi:10.7202/019449ar

Quand la culture fait médiation…

2009· article· fr· W1843771276 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jonathan Veillette

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Spaces through Art
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans l’article qui suit, nous proposons une approche qui répondrait aux ambiguïtés relatives à la notion de médiation culturelle. Partant de l’idée qu’il faut entendre par médiation culturelle un travail de questionnement, de redéfinition du social ou du politique depuis le champ de la culture, nous tournons notre regard vers des pratiques artistiques en milieu urbain, issues de collectifs culturels argentins. La critique des institutions effectuée par ces collectifs et la prégnance de la thématique mémorielle sont quelques-uns des repères qui nous indiquent qu’il s’agit effectivement de médiation culturelle, mais en un sens bien précis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.041
Scholarly communication0.0160.014
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicPublic Spaces through ArtFrench-language works237,207