MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1844015368

Colonialism: When will it End?

2002· article· es· W1844015368 on OpenAlexaff
Rodolfo Pino Robles

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2002
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropological Studies and Insights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismPolitical scienceGeographySociologyBusinessArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se examina cómo la imposición del proceso de colonización cambió la forma de vida de la gente, mostrando además que dicho proceso no terminó con la independencia de las colonias o con la creación de Estados-Naciones autónomas como Canadá o las repúblicas de Centro y Sudamérica. Se muestra la existencia de sistemas similares de colonización contra la gente indígena en nuestras sociedades. Este artículo sugiere la necesidad de reforzar los estudios indígenas para otorgarles una voz a las víctimas mediante el reconocimiento social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.029
Scholarly communication0.0110.014
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.338
GPT teacher head0.563
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicAnthropological Studies and InsightsFrench-language works237,207