MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1844109205 · doi:10.7202/1021267ar

Expérimentation d’une technologie mobile d’assistance à la réalisation de tâches pour soutenir l’autodétermination de personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle

2014· article· fr· W1844109205 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yves Lachapelle, Dany Lussier‐Desrochers, Martin Caouette, Martin Therrien-Bélec

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue francophone de la déficience intellectuelle · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les objectifs de cette recherche consistent à expérimenter un assistant à la réalisation de tâches (ART) chez des personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle (DI) et d’en évaluer l’impact sur leur autodétermination. L’ART est un téléphone intelligent muni d’une version francophone des applications Discovery Desktop et Visual Assistant . Quinze personnes, présentant une DI sans troubles associés, l’ont expérimenté pendant 8 semaines. Des entretiens de recherche semi-structurés ont été menés auprès d’un proche et d’un intervenant pour chacune des personnes avant et après l’intervention. Une analyse thématique des verbatim soutient l’hypothèse que des conditions particulières doivent être respectées lors de la sélection d’une tâche afin d’observer des impacts importants tant au niveau du développement de l’autodétermination des personnes que des pratiques d’intervention innovantes des parents et des intervenants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue francophone de la déficience intellectuelleSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207