MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1844126055

Health-related quality of life, treatment satisfaction and clinical aspects of patients with primary antibody deficiency receiving subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home

2006· dissertation· en· W1844126055 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Uwe Nicolay

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntibodyQuality of life (healthcare)ImmunologyNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with primary antibody deficiencies (PAD) are unable to produce sufficient amounts of antibodies and are therefore susceptible to severe bacterial infections. The standard therapy has been intravenous infusions of immunoglobulin G (IVIG) every 2-4 weeks. While this treatment has proved to be effective and safe, it is cumbersome for patients: it may be difficult to find venous access, and they have to visit the hospital regularly to deal with repeated IVIG infusions. IgG serum levels are not stable between infusions. Rapid subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIG) self-infusions provide a suitable alternative that has an excellent safety and efficacy profile, is easy, and can be performed at home. As IVIG and SCIG replacement therapies are both equally effective, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) such as health-related quality of life (HRQL), and treatment satisfaction (TS) may be used as criteria for an evidence-based choice of treatment alternatives. Studies investigating the infection experience of paediatric and adult PAD patients, as well as data addressing the HRQL and TS of PAD patients, have been rare or even non-existent. Some questionnaires used to capture PRO data have never been used or validated in PAD patients. For the present project two prospective multinational studies were conducted in PAD patients, one in Europe and Brazil, and another one in the USA and Canada, with the following objectives: to study the safety and efficacy of rapid SCIG self-infusions at home (adults, children); to compare IVIG replacement therapy in the hospital or at home and SCIG self-infusions at home with regard to PRO measures (HRQL: SF-36 for adults, CHQPF50 for children; TS: LQI for adults and children); and to examine validation aspects of the instruments used to assess HRQL and TS. Once they had switched from IVIG to SCIG therapy, IgG levels increased in children and remained constant in adults. Only one serious infection (pneumonia) occurred, and the rate of systemic adverse reactions, mainly mild, amounted to 1% of the infusions. Twenty-eight percent of the infusions were followed by mostly mild, local, transient tissue reactions which required no treatment and declined over time. Parents reported significant improvements related to their children's social functioning and health, the parents' own life situation and the way the family functioned. There was significant improvement on the SF-36 Mental Health and Social Functioning scales in the European study, and on the Role Physical, General Health and Health Transition scales in the North American study. The Vitality scale improved significantly in both studies. For patients on IVIG at hospital at enrolment, SCIG home therapy resulted in greater independence, with less disruption of daily activities, less impact on school, work and social activities, freedom to travel, better therapy convenience, comfort, treatment flexibility and pleasantness of treatment atmosphere. Patients who had received IVIG at home at study enrolment reported improved health status. Almost all adult and paediatric patients/caregivers preferred home treatment, and a great majority, even those who had been satisfied with IVIG at home, preferred subcutaneous self-infusions. The LQI could be broken down into four factors, relating to treatment interference with daily life activities, therapy-related problems, therapy setting and costs. To conclude, the studies have shown that SCIG self-infusions at home are not only effective and safe, but adults, children and their caregivers appreciate this method. HRQL is significantly improved and a marked improvement in TS gives the patients and their families greater independence and flexibility. List of scientific papers I. Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Bock A, Carvalho BC, Granert C, Haag S, Hernandez D, Kiessling P, Kus J, Pons J, Niehues T, Schmidt S, Schulze I, Borte M. (2006). Rapid subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy is effective and safe in children and adults with primary immunodeficiencies--a prospective, multi-national study. J Clin Immunol. 26(2): 177-85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16758340 II. Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Math D, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Bock A, Costa-Carvalho BT, Granert C, Haag S, Hernandez D, Kiessling P, Kus J, Matamoros N, Niehues T, Schmidt S, Schulze I, Borte M. (2004). Children and adults with primary antibody deficiencies gain quality of life by subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 114(4): 936-42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15480339 III. Nicolay U, Kiessling P, Berger M, Gupta S, Yel L, Roifman CM, Gardulf A, Eichmann F, Haag S, Massion C, Ochs HD. (2006). Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in North American patients with primary immunedeficiency diseases receiving subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J Clin Immunol. 26(1): 65-72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16418804 IV. Nicolay U, Haag S, Eichmann F, Herget S, Spruck D, Gardulf A. (2004). Measuring treatment satisfaction in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases receiving lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Qual Life Res. 14(7): 1683-91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16119180

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207