MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1844438946 · doi:10.14288/1.0085841

Relative population densities and transition probabilities in a neon glow discharge

2011· article· en· W1844438946 on OpenAlexaff
J. C. Irwin

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeonPopulationGlow dischargeAtomic physicsMaterials scienceArgonPhysicsPlasmaDemographyNuclear physicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental technique has been developed for the investigation of departures from thermodynamic equilibrium in plasmas. The relative populations of the upper and lower levels of a spectral line are measured by the reversal temperature method. The reversal temperatures themselves are determined by varying the relative exposure times of the background source and the plasma to be investigated. The relative population densities of the levels in the 2p⁵3s and 2p⁵3p configurations of Nel have been measured. A Neon glow discharge operated in the current region 1mA to 100mA served as the plasma. The results show that the excited gas is definitely not in thermal equilibrium. The relative intensities of the emission lines between the 2p⁵3s and 2p⁵3p configurations of NeI were measured photometrically and corrected for self-absorption. These intensities were then used in conjunction with the relative population densities to determine relative transition probabilities for the spectral lines concerned. The results are accurate to approximately 10% to 15% and are compared to the values obtained previously by other workers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.143
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications→French-language works237,207→