MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1844603596 · doi:10.5539/jgg.v7n3p35

Geotourism in Idaoutananes Moroccan Western High Atlas: State of valuation and opportunity of improvement

2015· article· en· W1844603596 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bourchich Noureddine, Adarab Hanane, Ezaidi Abdelkrim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geography and Geology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotourismTourismValuation (finance)SustainabilityNatural heritageCultural heritageAttractivenessSustainable developmentBusinessNatural resourceEnvironmental planningGeodiversityEcosystem servicesEnvironmental resource managementGeographyPolitical scienceEconomicsEcosystemBiodiversityEcologyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the light of the negative repercussions of the physical environment exploitation in economic purposes, the geologic substratum was set up as a heritage to preserve and manage sustainably. This new approach to debate the component of the natural environment holds its foundations of the experiences registered during the 1990s which made succeed in the decision taken by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) to promote a world network of geosites presenting particular geological characteristics, by adopting the Geotourism as one of the important elements for regional development. Morocco has followed this international trend through the integration of a nature tourism development program as part of national tourism development strategy. The territory of Ida_Outananes constitutes one of the target experimental spaces of the Moroccan Western High Atlas; the main reason of its choice is its fascinating natural and cultural resources. In this territory, the valuation of this ecological support shows a state of deterioration what threatens as well the quality of Geosystems, Ecosystems and the tourist attractiveness. This deterioration is a result of the opening of this space for tourist activity without a mechanism of management integrating a geopreservation program with a sustainable financing. Today, the payment of the environmental services (PES) may be an effective mechanism for a sustainable valuation of the geoheritage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geography and GeologySame topicGeotourism and Geoheritage ConservationFrench-language works237,207