Pioneer Solar Water Desalination System: Experimental Testing and Numerical Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pioneer system of solar water desalination was constructed, tested and numerically simulated for moderate latitudes, Cairo 30 °N. The humidification/dehumidification (HD) process is considered in this system. The salt water is heated by either solar energy or/and auxiliary heater before injection inside an insulated desalination chamber using an air atomizer. The air is supplied into a condenser by a 0.4 kW blower and later on it pulls hot salt water up through the atomizer from an insulated tank. By this idea the air is preheated inside the condenser and is used as a water pump. The flashing water is evaporated and condensed simultaneously above the condenser surface. A 2.39 M2 flat-plate solar collector is used to heat the salt water existed in an insulated tank. The tank opening is closed by the chamber one. By this way the salt water is circulated naturally inside the solar water heater where it is forced inside the desalination chamber. A numerical simulation of the considered system was developed and validated. It was provided a mathematical model of each system component. The system was successfully tested using either solar or/and auxiliary energies. It can produce about 36 liter daily of purified water where the using of solar energy alone can obtain about 12 liter on clear days. To visualize the heat and mass transfer inside the chamber temperature and humidity distribution were measured. The annual and monthly performance of the system is presented. In addition an empirical equation of the distilled water quantity is obtained versus the incident solar radiation. Moreover, economic study was provided and it is found that one liter of distilled water can cost about 0.2 US$ using the considered system. Key words: Solar desalination; Air atomizer; Air condenser; Thermosiphon; Humidification/dehumidification; Numerical simulation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".