MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1844939206 · doi:10.1002/0471264180.or018.03

The Reactions of Diazoacetic Esters with Alkenes, Alkynes, Heterocyclic and Aromatic Compounds

2011· other· en· W1844939206 on OpenAlexaff
Vinod Dave, E. W. Warnhoff

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic reactions · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurtius rearrangementChemistryTolueneOrganic chemistryEthyl diazoacetateCatalysisCyclopropanation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract After the first unsuccessful attempt of Curtius in 1884 to affect the reaction of ethyl diazoacetate with toluene other researchers studied the reaction. Later, Buchner and Curtius treated several aromatic, olefinic, and acetylenic compounds with diazoacetic esters to form cyclopropanes. Since then the reactions of diazoacetates with various unsaturated compounds have been studied. The carbalkoxy carbenes are of interest since they are believed to be intermediates in higher temperature thermal and photochemical reactions of diazoacetates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic reactionsSame topicCyclopropane Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207