MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1845182668 · doi:10.24124/c677/200849

Blogging the Hill: Garth Turner and the Canadian Parliamentary Blogosphere

2008· article· en· W1845182668 on OpenAlex
Tamara A. Small

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Political Science Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicE-Government and Public Services
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaucusBlogospherePoliticsMainstreamPolitical scienceMedia studiesConfidentialityLawPublic administrationSociologyThe InternetWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian parliamentarian Garth Turner was expelled from the caucus of the 
 governing Conservative Party in 2006. Turner was ousted because comments on 
 his blog allegedly breached caucus confidentiality. While political blogs are 
 mainstream in American politics, the study of Canadian political blogs is in its 
 infancy. This research addresses one aspect of political weblogs: blogging by 
 Canadian parliamentarians through a case study of Garth Turner Unedited. While 
 most current Canadian parliamentarians are online with their own web sites 
 promoting the constituency and party activities, Garth Turner is only one of a few 
 parliamentarians that embrace blogging in its full capacity. The research 
 demonstrates that the blog has become a virtual community for political 
 participation and expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it