MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1845227666

Proceedings of the first ACM international workshop on Multimedia technologies for distance learning

2009· article· en· W1845227666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultimediaThe InternetDistance educationSpace (punctuation)Emerging technologiesRank (graph theory)Information and Communications TechnologyWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceMathematics education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The organizing committee of the Second ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Technologies for Distance Leaning (MTDL 2010) will like to welcome all of you to join the workshop as well as the ACM Multimedia Conference 2010. Education is considered as one of the most important social activities by all countries and governments, especially in the age of information exchange through the Internet. Distance learning technologies, although still rely on educational professionals to have guidance, computer and communication technologies help remove the time and space restrictions that exist in traditional learning. This MTDL workshop aims to discuss new contributions as well as practical experiences using computer and communication technologies. Especially, it looks at the differences of using and without using multimedia technologies for education. In general, multimedia technologies can help students learn in a more interesting way as compared to traditional education methods, with sound and various media. Some educational theories also suggest that a few special trainings can be constructed much efficiently with the help from interactive multimedia. For instance, interactive simulation is useful in medical training. Additional technologies to fuse multidimensional information for e-learning are also interesting contributions from computer and sociological perspectives. On the other hand, interesting learning materials rely on good authoring technologies to combine learning activities for students. The materials for supporting these activities need to be located from local or a remote database and be retrieved efficiently. Therefore, how to search and rank learning objects from distance learning repositories has become not only a computer technology-based problem but also a communication issue. Communication technologies can also improve the attractiveness of social games and game-based learning. This year, we received a total of 14 papers (12 papers submitted and 2 papers recommended by the main conference), the program committee decided to accept 6 of them that were related to the above issues. These papers are from Canada, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Spain, Taiwan, and United Kingdom. Each paper was reviewed by at least three program committee members and discussed by the program committee co-chairs before acceptance. The overall acceptance rate is less than 43%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it