Proceedings of the first ACM international workshop on Multimedia technologies for distance learning
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The organizing committee of the Second ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Technologies for Distance Leaning (MTDL 2010) will like to welcome all of you to join the workshop as well as the ACM Multimedia Conference 2010. Education is considered as one of the most important social activities by all countries and governments, especially in the age of information exchange through the Internet. Distance learning technologies, although still rely on educational professionals to have guidance, computer and communication technologies help remove the time and space restrictions that exist in traditional learning. This MTDL workshop aims to discuss new contributions as well as practical experiences using computer and communication technologies. Especially, it looks at the differences of using and without using multimedia technologies for education. In general, multimedia technologies can help students learn in a more interesting way as compared to traditional education methods, with sound and various media. Some educational theories also suggest that a few special trainings can be constructed much efficiently with the help from interactive multimedia. For instance, interactive simulation is useful in medical training. Additional technologies to fuse multidimensional information for e-learning are also interesting contributions from computer and sociological perspectives. On the other hand, interesting learning materials rely on good authoring technologies to combine learning activities for students. The materials for supporting these activities need to be located from local or a remote database and be retrieved efficiently. Therefore, how to search and rank learning objects from distance learning repositories has become not only a computer technology-based problem but also a communication issue. Communication technologies can also improve the attractiveness of social games and game-based learning. This year, we received a total of 14 papers (12 papers submitted and 2 papers recommended by the main conference), the program committee decided to accept 6 of them that were related to the above issues. These papers are from Canada, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Spain, Taiwan, and United Kingdom. Each paper was reviewed by at least three program committee members and discussed by the program committee co-chairs before acceptance. The overall acceptance rate is less than 43%.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle