MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1845251870 · doi:10.7202/038136ar

Estimation de l’espérance de vie optimale au tournant du xxie siècle

2009· article· fr· W1845251870 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Robert Choinière, Carolyne Alix, Karine Garneau

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGynecologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La mesure de l’espérance de vie optimale est un exercice qui vise à estimer le nombre d’années que peut espérer vivre une population à partir des taux les plus faibles de mortalité, selon la cause, l’âge et le sexe, observés parmi les pays les plus industrialisés. Les résultats de cet exercice révèlent que l’espérance de vie optimale à la naissance, basée sur les données de 2001, serait de 87,6 ans chez les femmes et de 81,1 ans chez les hommes. En comparaison pour la même année, les valeurs d’espérance de vie à la naissance les plus élevées dans le monde industrialisé étaient enregistrées au Japon avec 85,0 ans chez les femmes et 78,1 ans chez les hommes. Au Québec, les valeurs se situaient à 82,2 ans chez les femmes et à 76,4 ans chez les hommes. Ces résultats suggèrent que des gains importants sont encore possibles en ce qui concerne la longévité moyenne des populations nationales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207