MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1845762609 · doi:10.1063/1.3246539

The Delta Scuti Star Rho Puppis: the Perfect Target to Probe the Theory Predicting Solar-like Oscillations in Cool Delta Scuti Stars

2009· article· en· W1845762609 on OpenAlexaff
V. Antoci, G. Handler, F. Carrier, F. Grundahl, J. M. Matthews, M. Hareter, R. Kuschnig, G. Houdek, Joyce Ann Guzik, Paul A. Bradley

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsStarsPhotometry (optics)AstrophysicsDeltaSpectral lineTelescopeStar (game theory)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical predictions of solar‐like oscillations in cool Delta Scuti stars motivated us to organize a spectroscopic observing campaign of the metal‐rich star Rho Puppis. High precision radial velocity measurements obtained in 2008 through an iodine cell attached to UCLES at the Anglo Australian Telescope (extracted with the code iSONG) as well as high resolution spectra observed with CORALIE at the Swiss 1.2−m Leonard Euler telescope, are the basis material for detecting the solar‐like pulsation. Furthermore we have 30 days of photometry observed with the MOST satellite, which led to the detection of at least two additional frequencies attributed to nonradial modes. Further intrinsic signals cannot be excluded. In this poster paper we present preliminary results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207