MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1846037674 · doi:10.1109/icii.2001.983565

DiffServ-enabled adaptive traffic engineering over MPLS

2002· article· en· W1846037674 on OpenAlexaff
T. Saad, Tingzhou Yang, Dimitrios Makrakis, Voicu Groza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultiprotocol Label SwitchingDifferentiated servicesComputer networkQuality of serviceTraffic engineeringInternet traffic engineeringNetwork packetThe InternetPath (computing)Distributed computingNetwork traffic control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past few years, new types of Internet applications that require performance guarantees beyond the best effort service have emerged. These applications have spread to include voice, video teleconferencing, and a new set of pervasive computing devices that demand hard delay bound guarantees. The Differentiated services model when combined with traffic engineering can provide a suitable architecture for ensuring QoS guarantees to such applications, especially when multiple parallel paths to the same destination exist in a provider's network. Multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) is a new technology that facilitates significantly the process of traffic engineering in IP networks. With MPLS and differentiated services traffic engineering (DS-TE), it is possible to define explicit routes with different performance guarantees on each route to ensure QoS constraints are met. We introduce a probe packet approach to measure the delay on established label switched paths (LSPs) between ingress/egress edge routers pair. These measurements are then used in a delay estimation algorithm to provide the measure of the expected delay within the path. We demonstrate, through simulations, that our proposed model provides a better service to higher priority traffic classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207