MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1846336609

Inspección no determinista de partes usando imágenes 3D de alta precisión

2004· article· es· W1846336609 on OpenAlex
Flavio Prieto, Pierre Boulanger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMagazine Portal Bibliotech Digital (Universidad Nacional de Colombia) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La inspección consiste en verificar la precisión de una parte con respecto a un cojunto de tolerancias especificadas. Este proceso se realiza en la industria mediante el uso de las Máquinas de Medición Tridimensional (MMT), las cuales pueden adquirir información de alta precisión pero son demasiado lentas. El desarrollo de los sensores de rango, que en los últimos años han incrementado la precisión y la velocidad de adquisición, ha permitido utilizarlos en los procesos inspección. Como a pesar de los avances, estos sensores no alcanzan la precisión de las MMT, se utiliza en este trabajo una estrategia de adquisición de imágenes 3D de alta precisión, la cual permite asociar a los puntos 3D un factor de incertidumbre. Este valor de incertidumbre actúa como un factor de ponderación en los resultados finales de inspección. Los resultados de la inspección se presentan sobre tolerancias dimensionales y geométricas. (Texto tomado de la fuente)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it