MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1846679029

José Sánchez Labrador (1717-1798) y la Geología del Paraguay Natural

2008· article· es· W1846679029 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConicet · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyNatural (archaeology)Archaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sánchez Labrador fue un autor prolífico de textos de doctrina católica, arte, idioma guaraní, antropología, agricultura y ciencias naturales. Un título destacado en este último sujeto es su Paraguay Natural (manuscrito inédito, Rávena, 1771). La primera parte del Paraguay Natural está dividida en tres libros. El libro primero mayormente se ocupa de minerales, aunque también incluye descripciones de rocas y fósiles. En el libro segundo, que trata principalmente sobre los ríos y las propiedades del agua, Sánchez Labrador refiere que los ríos Paraná y Uruguay eran capaces de petrificar madera y hueso, comparando además los grandes huesos de la desembocadura del Carcarañá con restos de elefantes o ballenas. El libro tercero trata sobre meteorología, terremotos y volcanes. La primera parte del Paraguay Natural constituye entonces un punto de referencia ineludible para el conocimiento geológico de la Cuenca del Plata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it