British Columbia's Southern Interior Forests Armillaria Root Disease Stand Establishment Decision Aid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Southern Interior of British Columbia, Armillaria (Armillaria ostoyae) root disease (DRA) causes considerable losses in immature stands by killing natural and planted coniferous trees. Tree mortality usually begins about 5–7 years after stand establishment, peaks around age 12, and then declines, although mortality can continue throughout a rotation. On the roots of older trees, repeated non-lethal infections will result in growth loss. The disease also increases the susceptibility of trees to attack by other pathogens and insects. DRA poses a long-term threat to forest productivity and sustainable forest management because current silviculture practices increase the amount and potential of Armillaria inoculum and put regenerated or residual trees at risk of becoming infected. This threat can be moderated by planting trees that are more resistant to Armillaria or by modifying silviculture practices to minimize exposure of trees to Armillaria inoculum in managed, secondgrowth stands. This extension note provides a revised table of host susceptibility ratings for species as well as a decision key to help natural resource managers choose from among several different treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it