Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consacree au peintre moderniste Guido Molinari, ne a Montreal en 1933, cette these comprend un essai et un catalogue raisonne. Dans le premier tome, a partir de l'analyse d'un important corpus de presse, d'une centaine d'entretiens avec le peintre, de nombreux entretiens avec des conservateurs, peintres, collectionneurs, et de ses œuvres, est apprehendee la maniere dont Molinari s'est impose comme artiste dans un contexte artistique, politique et social en constante mutation. Automatisme montrealais, Op art et art de l'intime ; nationalisme canadien et nationalisme quebecois ; logique de marche et soutien de l'Etat : autant d'elements contre lesquels ou avec lesquels Molinari a compose son identite d'artiste. Dans le second tome sont inclus les catalogues raisonnes des 1090 tableaux, 21 sculptures, 110 estampes et 5 livres d'art de l'artiste (avec, pour chaque notice, un historique de l'œuvre, une liste de ses expositions et une bibliographie), et la liste complete de ses expositions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".