MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W184782322

Preliminary Examination of Cervical Health Practices and Knowledge among University-Aged Females.

2005· article· en· W184782322 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCollege student journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCervical cancerMedicineCervixSexual intercourseCervical screeningPap testReproductive healthFamily medicineGynecologyCervical cancer screeningHealth educationObstetricsCancerPopulationPublic healthNursingEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cervical cancer is relatively preventable through regular cervical examinations and by engaging in healthy practices concerning lifestyle behaviors, like safe sexual intercourse. Despite the benefits that regular pap tests provide, screening tests continue to be under used by women, with younger women being one of the most negligent groups. Since knowledge levels are one of the most significant barriers in non-compliance, investigating the knowledge of younger women would seem essential. A questionnaire was distributed to female university students in Southwestern Ontario, Canada and examined: (1) socio-demographic information, (2) health information and health practices, and (3) knowledge of cervical health. Preliminary analysis revealed that women that had received a Pap test were more knowledgeable about cervical health than those that had not; however, overall knowledge among all women was inadequate. Although cervical screening affords women with the opportunity to take control of their cervical health, they may not be cognizant of issues surrounding cervical cancer to understand and engage in the appropriate cervical screening practices. ********** Cancer of the cervix is the second most frequent type of cancer for women between 20 to 44 years of age. (1) In Ontario alone 11 women develop and 3 die each week from cervical cancer. (2) What is most troubling about such statistics is the fact that cervical cancer is relatively preventable through regular Pap tests/cervical smear examinations (3) and practicing certain health behaviors. Many of the risk factors associated with the development of cervical cancer, such as multiple sexual partners, smoking, engaging in sexual intercourse at an early age, and absence of barrier contraception (4,5,6) are behaviors that, for the most part, are under the individual's control. As such, refraining from these unhealthy practices should decrease one's risk of disease development. In terms of screening, unfortunately, women have inadequate screening histories as demonstrated by surveys such as the 1994-1995 and 1996-1997 National Population Health Survey conducted in Canada. (3,7) Specifically, both younger and older women were most likely to have had a Pap test three or more years prior or to have never had a Pap test. (3,7) The fact that the Pap test has been associated with decreases in cervical cancer mortalities (8) is significant for women's health; however, these reductions are largely dependent upon the acceptance, and proper utilization practices and patterns of women. (9) Research has identified several barriers to non-compliance, such as lack of knowledge (10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) lack of financial resources, (10,13) fear surrounding the procedure or the disease and/or feelings of discomfort or embarrassment, (10,11,13,14) misinformation about screening recommendations, (10,11,14) and barriers to accessing health care and/or access to physicians. (11,14) Some women also considered the gender of the physician to be a determinant to having a pap test. (14,18) With adolescent women, fear of their parents finding out that they were sexually active was also a notable issue. (13) Despite the benefits that regular Pap tests provide women in detecting and preventing cervical cancer, screening tests continue to be under used by many women, (7,11) with younger women being one of the most noncompliant groups. (3,7) More importantly, 90% of cervical cancer cases are preventable with regular Pap tests. (2) Further, limited research efforts have focused on the cervical knowledge of younger women, particularly women in university/college. (19) Since knowledge levels are one of the most substantial barriers in noncompliance, completing research on the knowledge of younger women would seem essential in facilitating health care professionals with information concerning women and their cervical health practices. METHODS Questionnaire A questionnaire developed by the research team was distributed to female undergraduate students at a university in Southwestern Ontario. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it