Preliminary Examination of Cervical Health Practices and Knowledge among University-Aged Females.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cervical cancer is relatively preventable through regular cervical examinations and by engaging in healthy practices concerning lifestyle behaviors, like safe sexual intercourse. Despite the benefits that regular pap tests provide, screening tests continue to be under used by women, with younger women being one of the most negligent groups. Since knowledge levels are one of the most significant barriers in non-compliance, investigating the knowledge of younger women would seem essential. A questionnaire was distributed to female university students in Southwestern Ontario, Canada and examined: (1) socio-demographic information, (2) health information and health practices, and (3) knowledge of cervical health. Preliminary analysis revealed that women that had received a Pap test were more knowledgeable about cervical health than those that had not; however, overall knowledge among all women was inadequate. Although cervical screening affords women with the opportunity to take control of their cervical health, they may not be cognizant of issues surrounding cervical cancer to understand and engage in the appropriate cervical screening practices. ********** Cancer of the cervix is the second most frequent type of cancer for women between 20 to 44 years of age. (1) In Ontario alone 11 women develop and 3 die each week from cervical cancer. (2) What is most troubling about such statistics is the fact that cervical cancer is relatively preventable through regular Pap tests/cervical smear examinations (3) and practicing certain health behaviors. Many of the risk factors associated with the development of cervical cancer, such as multiple sexual partners, smoking, engaging in sexual intercourse at an early age, and absence of barrier contraception (4,5,6) are behaviors that, for the most part, are under the individual's control. As such, refraining from these unhealthy practices should decrease one's risk of disease development. In terms of screening, unfortunately, women have inadequate screening histories as demonstrated by surveys such as the 1994-1995 and 1996-1997 National Population Health Survey conducted in Canada. (3,7) Specifically, both younger and older women were most likely to have had a Pap test three or more years prior or to have never had a Pap test. (3,7) The fact that the Pap test has been associated with decreases in cervical cancer mortalities (8) is significant for women's health; however, these reductions are largely dependent upon the acceptance, and proper utilization practices and patterns of women. (9) Research has identified several barriers to non-compliance, such as lack of knowledge (10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) lack of financial resources, (10,13) fear surrounding the procedure or the disease and/or feelings of discomfort or embarrassment, (10,11,13,14) misinformation about screening recommendations, (10,11,14) and barriers to accessing health care and/or access to physicians. (11,14) Some women also considered the gender of the physician to be a determinant to having a pap test. (14,18) With adolescent women, fear of their parents finding out that they were sexually active was also a notable issue. (13) Despite the benefits that regular Pap tests provide women in detecting and preventing cervical cancer, screening tests continue to be under used by many women, (7,11) with younger women being one of the most noncompliant groups. (3,7) More importantly, 90% of cervical cancer cases are preventable with regular Pap tests. (2) Further, limited research efforts have focused on the cervical knowledge of younger women, particularly women in university/college. (19) Since knowledge levels are one of the most substantial barriers in noncompliance, completing research on the knowledge of younger women would seem essential in facilitating health care professionals with information concerning women and their cervical health practices. METHODS Questionnaire A questionnaire developed by the research team was distributed to female undergraduate students at a university in Southwestern Ontario. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».