MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1847865502 · doi:10.1109/wts.2014.6834995

Bayesian quantized network coding via generalized approximate message passing

2014· article· en· W1847865502 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdy Nabaee, Fabrice Labeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear network codingDecoding methodsComputer scienceMessage passingBelief propagationNetwork packetTheoretical computer scienceDistributed source codingRobustness (evolution)AlgorithmCoding (social sciences)Computer networkVariable-length codeMathematicsDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study message passing-based decoding of real network coded packets. We explain our developments on the idea of using real field network codes for distributed compression of inter-node correlated messages. Then, we discuss the use of iterative message passing-based decoding for the described network coding scenario, as the main contribution of this paper. Motivated by Bayesian compressed sensing, we discuss the possibility of approximate decoding, even with fewer received measurements (packets) than the number of messages. As a result, our real field network coding scenario, called quantized network coding, is capable of inter-node compression without the need to know the inter-node redundancy of messages. We also present our numerical and analytic arguments on the robustness and computational simplicity (relative to the previously proposed linear programming and standard belief propagation) of our proposed decoding algorithm for the quantized network coding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207