Practical Mechanism Design and Strategic Choice of China’s Industry Green Transformation: Base on the Perspective of Game Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, green economy has become the trend of world, and an industrial revolution as the core of green development has emerged. China’s industry experiences 30 years development, the resources and environment problems highlight increasingly, so it needs to transform into green development. However, both academic and practice do not have perfect practical mechanism of green transformation, and is also lack of strategic support system. Given this, Firstly, the paper researches the interactive relationship among main bodies in china’s industry green transformation by using the game theory; Secondly, on basis of the game results, focusing on different bodies’ main responsibilities and interests, we design the practical industry green transformation mechanism which taking the government as leading body, the industry circle & industrial enterprises & public as executing body, and the financial institution & transaction center & scientific research institute etc. as supporting body; Finally, in order to establish the policy framework, we propose “six in one” strategic choice of industry green transformation from government, region, industry, enterprise, society and individual’s view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".