MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1848182291 · doi:10.3233/nre-2011-0708

Etiology of the post-concussion syndrome: Physiogenesis and psychogenesis revisited

2011· review· en· W1848182291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurorehabilitation · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWorld Health Organization
KeywordsEtiologyConcussionMedicinePost-concussion syndromePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyIntensive care medicineInjury preventionPoison controlPsychiatryMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In his seminal article, Physiogenesis and Psychogenesis in the 'Post-Concussional Syndrome,' Lishman (1988) proposed that neurobiological factors account for the development of the post-concussion syndrome and psychological factors become primarily responsible for maintaining it in the chronic phase. Over the 20 years that followed, researchers have advanced our understanding of the etiology of the post-concussion syndrome. Our review of this evidence suggests that neurobiological and psychological factors play a causal role in post-concussion symptoms from the outset, and thus, Lishman's causal model should be updated. If we can clinically identify individuals on a trajectory of poor recovery in the acute post-injury stage, then we can direct secondary prevention towards modifiable risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it