MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1848205631 · doi:10.1139/v00-039

Reductive deposition of Au<sup>3+</sup>(aq) on oxidized silicon surfaces

2000· article· en· W1848205631 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Şefik Süzer, Ömer Dag

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyChemistrySiliconAqueous solutionOxidation stateSubstrate (aquarium)Layer (electronics)MetalDeposition (geology)OxideInertChemical stateInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is used to determine the oxidation state of gold deposited from an aqueous solution of AuCl 4 - on to various oxidized surfaces of silicon. Although the observed Au4f signal decreased with the thickness of the oxide layer, the oxidation state of Au was determined as 0 for all the samples analyzed. From the angular dependence of the Si2p and Au4f signals it was determined that Au is deposited on top of the oxidized surfaces of metallic silicon. It is postulated that from an aqueous solution of AuCl 4 - , gold would deposit in its zerovalent form on to any surface due to its large and positive electrochemical reduction potential (ε ° red (Au 3+ /Au) = +1.50 V) and the substrate plays a role only in providing active deposition sites. To further support the proposal, it is shown that the same process takes place even in inert and hydrophobic polypropylene substrates. Similarly, it is also shown that more gold deposits if the surface of the polypropylene is made less hydrophobic (but probably more active) via the industrially used corona discharge treatment.Key words: XPS, gold, electroless deposition, oxidized silicon surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicElectrodeposition and Electroless CoatingsFrench-language works237,207