Reductive deposition of Au<sup>3+</sup>(aq) on oxidized silicon surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is used to determine the oxidation state of gold deposited from an aqueous solution of AuCl 4 - on to various oxidized surfaces of silicon. Although the observed Au4f signal decreased with the thickness of the oxide layer, the oxidation state of Au was determined as 0 for all the samples analyzed. From the angular dependence of the Si2p and Au4f signals it was determined that Au is deposited on top of the oxidized surfaces of metallic silicon. It is postulated that from an aqueous solution of AuCl 4 - , gold would deposit in its zerovalent form on to any surface due to its large and positive electrochemical reduction potential (ε ° red (Au 3+ /Au) = +1.50 V) and the substrate plays a role only in providing active deposition sites. To further support the proposal, it is shown that the same process takes place even in inert and hydrophobic polypropylene substrates. Similarly, it is also shown that more gold deposits if the surface of the polypropylene is made less hydrophobic (but probably more active) via the industrially used corona discharge treatment.Key words: XPS, gold, electroless deposition, oxidized silicon surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".