MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1848241700 · doi:10.5858/2000-124-1324-ppfebv

Proportion Positive for Epstein-Barr Virus, Cytomegalovirus, Human Herpesvirus 6, Toxoplasma, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Types 1 and 2 in Heterophile-Negative Patients With an Absolute Lymphocytosis or an Instrument-Generated Atypical Lymphocyte Flag

2000· article· en· W1848241700 on OpenAlexaff
Yotis Tsaparas, Malcolm L. Brigden, Richard Mathias, Éva Thomas, Janet Raboud, Patrick Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Blood ServicesBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphocytosisMedicineVirologySerologyImmunologyPopulationHeterophileCytomegalovirusLymphocyteAntibodyVirusHerpesviridaeViral disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patients with evidence of an acute infection due to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), Toxoplasma, or human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2) in heterophile-negative patients with an absolute lymphocytosis or an instrument-generated atypical lymphocyte flag, and to develop a cost-effective testing algorithm for managing such heterophile-negative patients. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective investigation of 70 selected outpatients who tested negative for heterophile antibody in association with an absolute lymphocytosis or instrument-generated atypical lymphocyte flag. The control population consisted of 50 patients who were heterophile negative and had a normal absolute lymphocyte count and no instrument-generated atypical lymphocyte flag. SETTING: A large outpatient laboratory system. INTERVENTION: Viral serology for HHV-6 was performed by immunofluorescence, and all other serologies were performed by enzyme-linked immunoassay. All testing was for immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibodies, except in the case of HIV. RESULTS: The proportion of study patients positive for EBV was 40% (28/70); for CMV, 39% (27/70); for HHV-6, 25% (16/65); for Toxoplasma, 3% (2/70); and for HIV, 0% (0/70). All 50 control patients were negative for EBV IgM antibodies. When patients with more than 1 positive viral test were excluded from analysis, positivity was 20% (9/45) for EBV, 22% (10/45) for CMV, 9% (4/45) for HHV-6, and 2% (1/45) for Toxoplasma. Utilizing hypothesis-generating logistic regression models, Downey type II atypical lymphocytes were significantly associated with EBV positivity (P =.006), while Downey type III lymphocytes were significantly associated with HHV-6 positivity (P =.016), and there was a trend for the association of Downey type I lymphocytes with CMV positivity (P =.097). CONCLUSIONS: A positive viral serology was identified in 70% of study patients. Multiple positive serologies complicate establishing a definitive diagnosis. Potential cost savings may be associated with the use of an appropriate testing algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineSame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207