MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1848410351 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1982.1171470

Generalized Burg algorithm for beamforming in correlated multipath field

2005· article· en· W1848410351 on OpenAlexaff
S. Kesler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmToeplitz matrixBeamformingMultipath propagationEstimatorMathematicsSonarComputer scienceGaussian noiseCyclostationary processTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Array beamforming employing nonlinear methods of spectral estimation presents a difficult problem when the spatial field is inhomogeneous, e.g., when correlated multipath is present, and hence, the corresponding cross-spectral (CS) matrix is non-Toeplitz. To overcome this difficulty in the maximum entropy (ME) beamforming, we present a generalization of the Burg algorithm for dealing with a non-Toeplitz CS matrix. The stability and minimum phase properties of the original Burg algorithm are retained. The use of the generalized Burg algorithm for elevation angle estimation is illustrated for the case of a passive sonar field. Statistical properties of the estimator are analyzed using (1) uncorrelated Gaussian noise only, and (2) the direct and specular multipath components of the target signal, embedded in uncorrelated noise and in directional ambient noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207