MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1848692777 · doi:10.18060/37

Substance Abuse and Suicidal Behavior inWomen Ages 30 to 39 Years

2002· article· en· W1848692777 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nancy J. Osgood, Ameda A. Manetta

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Social Work · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuicidal behaviorPsychiatryQuarter (Canadian coin)Substance abuseLimitingPsychologyClinical psychologySubstance abuse treatmentMedicineSuicide preventionPoison controlMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A growing number of young women abuse substances and engage in suicidal behavior. Combinations of these problems are under-researched. Research that exists includes women of all ages in the samples. This study adds information to the current state of knowledge on these problem behaviors by limiting the sample to women ages 30 to 39 years. A group of 113 women, part of a larger study of 364 women who had received inpatient psychiatric treatment,was included in this study. Findings revealed that most of the women had made at least one suicide attempt and nearly one-quarter were in the hospital for a current attempt. Almost 60% had engaged in substance abuse at some point in their lives. The combination of continued substance abuse and suicidal behavior could result in an early death for some women. Implications for treatment and future research are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Social WorkSame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207