MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1848832590 · doi:10.1109/picmet.1991.183627

Using project management for strategic advantage in the public sector

2002· article· en· W1848832590 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology Management : the New International Language · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProject managementProject charterGovernment (linguistics)Engineering managementProject management triangleOPM3Project stakeholderProject managerExtreme project managementProgram managementPrivate sectorPublic sectorBusinessProcess managementEngineeringComputer scienceKnowledge managementPolitical scienceSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CANMET, the Government of Canada's mineral and energy national technology center, has developed and implemented a project management methodology intended to be an integral part of its strategy. The methodology is not only designed to ensure timely and effective project implementation, but also to assist CANMET in developing a strong working relationship with its clients and partners in both the private and public sectors. The author describes the major elements of CANMET's project management approach, how it is being implemented. and its anticipated operational and strategic benefits for CANMET. Project leadership seminars for both CANMET staff and client representative have been carried out to assist in the application of the project management methodology.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it