MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1849168427 · doi:10.3917/riges.334.0048

Créer une culture de service

2008· article· fr· W1849168427 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jocelyn Pinet, André Coupet

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Pour devenir une entreprise axée sur la qualité du service au client, il ne s’agit plus d’ajouter une énième initiative, mais bien d’opérer un virage culturel piloté par des leaders engagés dans la qualité du service au client. Dans cet article, nous examinons l’influence qu’exercent les cultures organisationnelles sur les comportements des personnes et voyons comment, dans une culture axée sur le service, le personnel ne se contente pas d’offrir un bon service, mais qu’il se préoccupe d’être au service de ses clients. Nous présentons aussi les caractéristiques qui distinguent un leader d’un gestionnaire. Nous proposons un modèle fondé sur trois axes, où le leadership agit en tant que pierre angulaire à l’aide des gestes forts accomplis sur des thèmes précis qui permettent à l’entreprise de conduire une transformation culturelle axée sur le client.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementFrench-language works237,207