Relationship between early myocardial reperfusion assessed by videodensitometry and late left ventricular function. Results following invasive treatment of acute myocardial infarction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It is known that there is a relationship between myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function. AIM: The aim of the current study was to examine the relationship between myocardial reperfusion as assessed by videodensitometry on coronary angiograms following invasive treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction and magnetic resonance imaging-derived late left ventricular function. METHOD: The study included 25 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. A quantitative parameter of myocardial (re)perfusion was calculated by the ratio of maximal density (Gmax) and the time to reach maximum density (Tmax) following invasive treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 387±262 days after ST elevation myocardial infarction for the evaluation of left ventricular function in all cases. RESULTS: Significant correlations were demonstrated between left ventricular ejection fraction and Gmax (r = 0.40, p = 0.05) and Gmax/Tmax (r = 0.41, p = 0.04) following vessel masking. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate significant relationship between densitometric Gmax/Tmax and late left ventricular function following ST elevation myocardial infarction. Orv. Hetil., 2014. 155(5), 187-193.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it