Sangamon and Pre-Sangamon Interglaciations in the Hudson Bay Lowlands of Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The manuscript documents voluminous new and published stratigraphie and paléontologie data from a region unique in North America, and possibly the world, in that it has abundant natural exposures recording a long and consistent succession of Quaternary tills and fossiliferous intertill sediments. Two major non-glacial intervals have been recognized under tills. Various non-glacial sediments have been correlated using their stratigraphie position, pollen analysis, and beetle assemblages, and are found to be equivalent to the Missinaibi Formation in Ontario. Non-finite high pressure radiocarbon dates, and aspartic acid ratios on wood suggest that the uppermost and most prevalent interval is of Sangamonian age. The Sangamonian record begins and ends with cool intervals, separated by a warmer period when climates were similar to or slightly warmer than present, and when the northern treeline was near its present position. The interval began with a high glacioisostatic sea, which regressed to levels below present Hudson Bay datum. The Sundance paleosol and silt beds below the Amery till relate to an earlier interglaciation characterized by cool tundra conditions. As an analogue for predicting future global change, the record preserved in the Hudson Bay Lowlands is second to none: additional intensive research is strongly recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".