Uso de complexo enzimático em dietas para tilápia do Nilo: digestibilidade, atividade enzimática, desempenho produtivo e parâmetros fisiológicos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inclusion of enzyme supplement in fish diets is a promising strategy to increase the feed efficiency. This work aimed to evaluate the effect of inclusion of the enzymatic complex (Allzyme SSF) on apparent digestibility and non-specific protease activity in juvenile Nile tilapia. Six levels of inclusion of the enzymatic complex were evaluated (0; 0.025; 0.040; 0.055; 0.070 and 0.085%). A total of 486 fish were distributed in 18 feeding aquaria and 18 tanks of faeces collection (modified Guelph system). After 10 and 20 days of feeding, four fish per aquarium were collected and the anterior portion of the intestine were sampled. The experimental design was completely randomized with six treatments and four replicates. There was no significant difference in the apparent digestibility coefficients (ADCs) of protein, gross energy and protease activity among the tested levels of inclusion and periods. Under the conditions evaluated the inclusion of the enzymatic complex did not improve the digestibility of diets in juvenile Nile tilapia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".