Anne Besson et Évelyne Jacquelin (dir.), Le Merveilleux entre mythe et littérature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trs actives dans le domaine des genres de l'imaginaire, Anne Besson et velyne Jacquelin proposent avec Le merveilleux entre mythe et littrature un ventail des problmatiques entourant le merveilleux, le mythe et la religion. Fruits du colloque tenu en 2009, les dix-huit contributions interdisciplinaires de spcialistes tant franais qu'trangers permettent de saisir la richesse des variations pistmologiques et esthtiques du merveilleux. Une des forces de cet ouvrage rside d'ailleurs dans le fait qu'il invite le lecteur faire des recoupements entre les poques et les lieux de productions, tout en mesurant l'volution des relations entre le merveilleux, la religion et le mythe. Cet ouvrage solide stimulera quiconque s'intresse au merveilleux et ses genres connexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".