MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W185033826

Need to Share

2006· article· en· W185033826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Marine Safety & Security Council · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessAerospaceInternational tradeInformation sharingComputer securityPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the importance of sharing information between Canada and the United States to enhance the two countries' combined defense and security. Because the two countries share an 8,891-kilometer border and are each other's largest trading partners, any significant interruption of trade would result in major economic difficulties for both countries. Several reports in both the U.S. and Canada have emphasized the need for better coordination. Recognizing this need, the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) bilateral agreement was recently expanded to add maritime warning for North America as a new mission. NORAD's new mission is focused upon information sharing between Canada and the United States regarding potential maritime threats. Placing this responsibility upon NORAD tightens the information-sharing seam between the aerospace and maritime domains and reduces the gap that formerly existed between Canadian and American defense and security organizations. Planning efforts are underway to determine where existing organizations and structures could add synergies to each other's operations while avoiding duplication of effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it