MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1850516958 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2004.1359002

Technology portable delay model for DSM CMOS inverters

2004· article· en· W1850516958 on OpenAlexaff
Adnan Kabbani, D. Al-Khalili, A.J. Al-Khalili

Bibliographic record

VenueThe 2nd Annual IEEE Northeast Workshop on Circuits and Systems, 2004. NEWCAS 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSInverterSemiconductor device modelingRange (aeronautics)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A closed form expression to accurately estimate the delay of a CMOS deep submicron (DSM) inverter is presented in this paper. This model does not depend on any extracted or fitting parameters. Instead it depends on the device model parameters. This model exhibits a good accuracy when compared with Spectre simulations using BSIM3v3 model, for a wide range of device sizes, capacitive loads, transition times, and aspect ratios (W/sub p//W/sub n/). Since this model is independent of extracted and fitting parameters, it is technology portable. The model is validated for three DSM technologies (UMC's 0.13 /spl mu/m, and TSMC's 0.18 /spl mu/m and 0.25 /spl mu/m). For all, the model shows good accuracy with on average error of about 4%. The maximum error is less than 10%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe 2nd Annual IEEE Northeast Workshop on Circuits and Systems, 2004. NEWCAS 2004.Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207