Photodetachment of H<sup><i>–</i></sup> ion in perpendicular electric and magnetic fields near a metal surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photodetachment of the H– ion in perpendicular electric and magnetic fields near a metal surface has been investigated on the basis of the semiclassical closed-orbit theory. Firstly, we give a clear physical picture of the detached electron’s movement and find out the closed orbits of this system. Then we put forward an analytical formula for calculating the photodetachment cross section. It is found that the perpendicular electric and magnetic fields can produce some interesting effects. As the magnetic field is relatively weak, the influence of the electric field and the electrostatic potential dominates and the oscillatory structure in the photodetachment cross section exhibits a smoothly oscillating curve. As we keep the electric field and the ion–surface distance unchanged, with the increase of the magnetic field strength, the number of closed orbits is increased and the oscillatory structure in the photodetachment cross section is characterized by broad Landau level envelops. Therefore, we can use the perpendicular electric and magnetic fields to control the photodetachment of H– near a metal surface. Our study may guide future experimental research on the photodetachment microscopy of negative ion in external fields near surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".