MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1850580041 · doi:10.7775/rac.v77i6.2081

Análisis simultáneo del strain 2D, de la reserva coronaria y de la contractilidad parietal durante el eco estrés con dipiridamol. Resultados comparativos.

2025· article· es· W1850580041 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge Lowenstein, Víctor Darúd, Miguel Amor, Adrián Carlessi, Gustavo Zambrana, Martín Descalzo, Mario Embón, Graciela Rousse

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Argentina de Cardiología · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dipyridamole stress echo (DSE) is an accepted pharmacological test for the evaluation of patients with ischemic pathology; it is demonstrated that it is an ideal technique to combine the visual information of contractility with coronary flow reserve (CFR), but there is no information regarding the use of 2D-strain (two-dimensional deformation) for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia, so its evaluation and the comparison of results with other methods for the determination of regional ischemia may be of singular practical interest.Objective: To compare, during dipyridamole stress echo (DSE), the results of the visual analysis of wall contractility with the value of CFR of the anterior descending artery (ADA) and with the behaviour of longitudinal 2D-strain in the same area, using myocardial perfusion with simultaneous 99m Tc-sestamibi SPECT as gold standard for the diagnosis of ischemia.Material and Methods: A total of 41 patients (16 men; mean age 68.5 years) referred for DSE were evaluated. The obtained longitudinal 2D-strain was averaged out in the 9 segments corresponding to the ADA from the three apical views both at rest and during stress, considering ischemia the reduction in deformation or an increase lower than 5%. At the peak effect of 0.84 mg/kg of dipyridamole, wall motion and CFR of the ADA (normal: >2) were evaluated, and 99m Tc-sestamibi for stress SPECT was injected, completing its rest view at 24–48 hours.Results: A total of 3 patients were excluded, one due to weak signal in the ADA and two due to suboptimal window for 2D-strain. Twelve patients with reversible defects with SPECT were considered ischemic. There was agreement in the four parameters evaluated in 6 patients with all abnormal studies and in 23 with all normal studies. Longitudinal deformation in the ADA area in patients with normal SPECT was –19.9 (–18, –22) at rest and –22.5 (–21, –26) at the peak of dipyridamole stress echo (p=0.0003). In patients with ischemic SPECT, 2D-strain was –19.35 (–17, –22) at rest and –20.25 (–13, –21) at the peak of dipyridamole stress echo (p=ns). CFR showed a sensitivity of 66.7% (HF 95% 35.4–88.7) and a specificity of 100%; 2D-strain showed a sensitivity of 83.3% (HF 95% 50.9–97) and a specificity of 88.5% (HF 95% 68.7–97).Conclusions: 2D-strain during dipyridamole stress echo proved to be a feasible quantitative method with similar effectiveness to CFR and superior to visual contractility analysis for detecting ischemia in the ADA territory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Argentina de CardiologíaSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207