MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1850612168 · doi:10.1139/v2012-067

A versatile method for the synthesis of γ-pyrones

2012· article· en· W1850612168 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Garrison E. Beye, Athanasios Karagiannis, Alieh Kazemeini, Dale E. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis of heterocyclic compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsChemistryAldol reactionTriflic acidDithianeDithiolaneSynthonKetoneOrganic chemistryAdductMethyleneCombinatorial chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A versatile three-step procedure to annulate a γ-pyrone onto a methylene ketone was developed involving (i) aldol reaction with a dithiolane-protected β-ketoaldehyde, (ii) oxidation of the aldol adduct to a β-diketone, and (iii) treatment of the resulting dithiolane-protected 1,3,5-trione with 2-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX) and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (triflic acid; TfOH) in acetonitrile at ambient temperature to give the corresponding γ-pyrone. Cyclization proceeded with IBX alone, but significantly improved yields were obtained with added acid, particularly triflic acid. A dithiolane was more effective than a dithiane or acyclic dithioacetal protecting group. The method was amenable to the preparation of a variety of substituted γ-pyrones simply by altering the initial aldol reactants. Overall yields of 50%–60% were obtained in six examples. The method was applied to prepare a key fragment for the total synthesis of baconipyrones A and C and siphonarin B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis of heterocyclic compoundsFrench-language works237,207