Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interventions : Tous les patients âges de 30 ans et plus se presentant a l’un des 191 sites participants etaient soumis a un test de tolerance au glucose (75 g glucose oral), a la suite de quoi on etablissait leur admissibilite a l’etude. Les patients admissibles etaient alors soumis a la phase d’essai de 17 jours avec placebo a simple aveugle. Les participants admissibles, consentants et ayant pris au moins 80 % des doses lors de la phase d’essai etaient enroles dans l’etude et randomises. La repartition aleatoire de style 2 x 2 attribuait les participants soit au groupe rosiglitazone (4 mg die pour les deux premiers mois et ensuite 8 mg die) ou placebo, soit au groupe ramipril (5 mg die pour les deux premiers mois, 10 mg die par la suite et 15 mg die apres 1 an) ou placebo. Les patients ont ete suivis pour une duree moyenne de trois ans, avec une visite deux mois et six mois apres la repartition aleatoire et tous les six mois par la suite. Lors de chacune des visites, on rappelait aux patients l’importance d’avoir de saines habitudes de vie ainsi qu’une diete appropriee, et on procedait aussi a une evaluation et a un renforcement de l’observance. On mesurait chaque annee la glycemie a jeun et l’hemoglobine glyquee. Apres deux ans et a la visite finale, on realisait un test de tolerance au glucose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".