MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1851287834 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2009.20413

Insight: In Conversation with Shirlee Sharkey

2009· article· en· W1851287834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ken Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLeadership and Management in Organizations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationPsychologyPublic relationsBusinessComputer sciencePolitical scienceCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

aint Elizabeth Health Care (SEHC) tells its clients and partner agencies that it is ahead by a century -and not just because it celebrated its 100th anniversary in 2008.Rather, SEHC takes pride in talent management, leadership, innovation, knowledge and experience -precursors to service excellence, client satisfaction and employee engagement.With revenues exceeding $100 million, a designation as a Top 50 Workplace in Canada and status as an undisputed leader in community-based health services, SEHC has a culture of quickly responding to emerging trends and getting it right.President and chief executive officer (CEO) Shirlee Sharkey is no stranger to healthcare's evolution in and devolution to community-based care; her leadership in promoting the imperative and capacity of communities has been equally ahead of its time.Shirlee, the recipient of the University of Toronto's Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (HPME) Leadership Award for 2008 and Ernst and Young's Entrepreneur of the Year award, spoke with Ken Tremblay from St. Elizabeth's head office in Markham, Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0130.035
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicLeadership and Management in OrganizationsFrench-language works237,207